McMorrow Report Home


Energy Efficiency Measures Combat Rising Energy Costs

Most North American business leaders, fully 79%, expect energy prices to continue increasing – and are investing in energy efficiency measures to fight these rising costs. They anticipate an increase of 13.25%. Despite the trend toward sustainability, decrease energy expenditures is actually the greater motivator over environmental responsibility, according to a study by Johnson Controls and the International Facility Management Association (IFMA).

More than half (52%) of the survey respondents say costs savings is either entirely or somewhat the driver for their decision to invest in energy efficiency measures.  About a third (35%) say cost savings and environmental responsibility are equal motivators, while only 13% cite environmental concern as the greater motivator.

And they’re paying more attention. About two-thirds of business leaders polled are paying more attention to energy efficiency today than five years ago. And almost as many expect to make energy efficiency improvements using their capital budgets, spending an average of 8% of those budgets. In addition, 64% anticipate using their operating budgets, allocating 6% to energy efficiency improvements, focusing on conservative energy management solution. Of respondents who have already made energy efficiency investments:

  • 70% educated staff and other facility users on how to be more efficient;
  • 67% switched to energy efficient lighting;
  • 60% have adjusted HVAC controls; and
  • 46% have installed lighting sensors.

Commercial buildings consume about 40% of natural gas and 60% of the electricity generated in the United States. So, it’s not surprising that three quarters of executives with companies that are building or planning to build new facilities, or are launching retrofits in the next year, say that energy efficiency will be a priority in the design of those projects.

When it comes to energy supply-related matters, 36% have negotiated energy contracts with suppliers. Only 14% are putting energy price hedging strategies in place.  In addition, 11%  currently have a stated carbon reduction goal.

Companies have by and large not relaxed their payback requirements for such measures. About two thirds of companies (64%) have a maximum payback period of two and five years. Overall, only 18% of those surveyed say their companies would allow a longer payback period today than five years ago. About 45% say the required payback period has not changed compared with five years ago.

Executives responsible for larger facilities (500,000 square feet or more) are an exception. They spend a bigger part of their budgets on energy, are planning to invest more of their budgets on energy efficiency measures, and will tolerate a longer payback period. For more information, see www.ifma.org.

Johnson Controls’ Energy Efficiency Indicator Results At-A-Glance

Here are some specific results of the Energy Efficiency Indicator research.

In response to organizations’ motivation for investing in energy efficiency:

  • 6 percent say their motivation was entirely costs savings
  • 46 percent say it is mostly related or somewhat related to costs savings
  • 35 percent say the two factors are equal motivators
  • 12 percent say environmental responsibility was somewhat more or mostly the motivator
  • 1 percent say the motivation was 100 percent environmental responsibility

Larger facilities (500,000 square feet or more):

  • Spend an average of 12 percent of their budget on energy, compared to an average of 7 percent for those with less than 100,000 square feet
  • More plan to invest in energy efficiency measures – around 80 percent out of capital budgets and 80 percent out of operating budgets –  compared to the survey’s average of about 60 percent
  • 26 percent say they are also tolerating a longer payback period on those investments compared to five years ago compared to 16 percent of organizations with between 100,000 and 500,000 square feet

Overall:

  • About 50 percent of the executives said they plan to tap both operating and capital budgets for energy efficiency improvements
  • 23 percent of the executives said they were paying “a lot more” attention to energy efficiency today versus a year ago
  • 39 percent said they were paying “a little more” attention to energy efficiency than a year ago